ChrisWI wrote:
The "Commander in Chief" thing is purely ceremonial and rightfully so as only the military should command the military. There have only been 2 occasions in history where a president has commanded troops directly. [...]
I wouldn't call the position of the President as Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces "ceremonial." The President is at the top of the military chain of command, and can and does issue orders to military officers, though usually only at the highest level. Orders from the President are legally binding in exactly the same way as any other military order. The courts have upheld this many times.
Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces is a civilian rather than military office, which is why there is no uniform or insignia for the President. Occasionally a President will wear a military article of clothing, like a flight jacket or a ship's ball cap, but never with military-regulation insignia.
BTW there used to be a number of four-star military positions that carried the title of "commander in chief," but in 2002 the title was reserved for the President alone.
best regards,
Justin