Torg003 wrote:It basically comes down to how to see the air force being formed. Did it start out as an army air/flying corps (as in the US) or as a merger of air elements of army and navy (as in UK and Commonwealth). It might be interesting to not have an air force as a separate service, but have the army and navy keep their air elements separate and show the special insignia that might have developed for each one. For example, I could see a CSN Air Service (or Air Arm) having an eagle instead of anchors in the enlisted insignia and using the rank title aircraftsman (or airman) instead of seaman. Higher ranks could use terms like, Technician and Master Technician.
Someone on another forum suggested something along the same line and to be honest, it seems like it might be a good. His suggestion was that a country which would not have been involved in any war (assuming the CSA had turned into a pariah state post ACW) and only have air branches as support to the army, navy and possibly some sort of border service.
The other option was to use a naval type insignias where the enlisted would use exactly the same progression as naval rates but with the single anchor being replaced by a 2 arms propeller and the crossed anchors by a 4 arms one. probably in grey on dark blue.
Officers would also use the progession of their equivalent but theirs bars wouldn't have a curl and instead would have a bird in flight over it (maybe a buzzard ?).